The healthcare industry has witnessed a significant rise in the application of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies over the past decade. While AI’s impact in areas like radiology, surgery, and diagnostics has been widely discussed, its integration within nursing practice has been less explored. Nurses, as the primary caregivers in healthcare, stand to benefit greatly from AI advancements. However, research on how AI can enhance nursing practice, improve patient outcomes, and streamline workflows remains fragmented. AI tools in nursing are enhancing patient care, efficiency, and reducing errors globally and in India. The global AI healthcare market is projected to grow from $22.4 billion in 2023 to $102.2 billion by 2030, while India’s market is expected to reach $20 billion by 2028.
Need for the Study
The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence in healthcare has transformed various medical specialities, yet its integration into nursing remains underexplored despite its immense potential Nurses play a pivotal role in direct patient care, monitoring, coordination, and clinical decisionmaking. With increasing patient loads, complex healthcare needs, and workforce shortages, AIdriven technologies offer promising solutions to enhance nursing efficiency, accuracy, and overall care quality.
As AI continues to influence healthcare delivery globally, it is crucial to assess its impact specifically within the nursing domain. Understanding how AI can aid in clinical decisionmaking, reduce workload, and improve patient outcomes is essential for strategic implementation. Moreover, as AI adoption grows in countries like India and across the globe, evaluating its benefits, limitations, and practical applications in nursing becomes a pressing need.
This study aims to fill that knowledge gap by providing a comprehensive synthesis of existing research on AI in nursing practice.
Review of Literature
Topaz et al (2019) conducted a study using natural language processing (NLP) algorithms to analyse nursing notes, demonstrating improved early detection of clinical deterioration in hospitalised patients. Similarly, Cho et al (2021) evaluated an AI-based decision support system used by nurses in intensive care units (ICUs), reporting a statistically significant reduction in medication errors and improved clinical outcomes.Sendak et al (2020) implemented machine learning algorithms in real-time patient monitoring systems and found that these tools enhanced nurses' ability to detect early signs of sepsis and deterioration. Moreover, Krittanawong et al (2021) emphasised the utility of AI in predictive analytics for chronic disease management, allowing nurses to proactively address patient needs and reduce hospital readmissions. Blease et al (2021) conducted a mixed-methods study on the adoption of AI in hospital nursing departments, finding that automated scheduling, documentation, and administrative support systems significantly reduced nurse workload and documentation time. The study also noted improvements in job satisfaction and perceived care quality among nurses using AI tools.
Li et al (2020) reported barriers such as a lack of standardised protocols, insufficient training, and ethical concerns regarding patient data usage. Their study concluded that without proper infrastructure and education, AI implementation could lead to workflow disruptions and increased anxiety among nursing staff. Wang et al (2023) conducted a systematic review of AI in nursing across high-income countries and found that while technological integration was more advanced, socio-technical challenges persisted. In contrast, Sharma et al (2022) explored AI use in Indian tertiary hospitals, showing that AI-supported triage systems significantly improved patient prioritisation and reduced wait times in emergency care settings. However, the study also highlighted limitations in infrastructure and digital literacy.
The literature reviewed indicates that AI has a growing and impactful presence in nursing practice. It enhances decision-making, improves monitoring and outcomes, and reduces administrative burdens. Nevertheless, its successful implementation requires overcoming technical, educational, and ethical barriers. While most studies highlight the positive implications of AI in nursing, there is a need for larger, multi-site trials and longitudinal research to understand its long-term effects on clinical practice and workforce dynamics.
Methods
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion criteria: Studies published from January 2010 to February 2024 focussing on AI technologies in nursing practice, including clinical decision-making, patient monitoring, diagnostic assistance, and workflow management, and those involving nurse or patient outcomes as primary endpoints were included. Peer-reviewed articles and conference proceedings were also included. Exclusion criteria: Articles not focusing specifically on nursing or healthcare applications, studies with insufficient data for meta-analysis or outcome measurement and studies not applying AI directly in clinical nursing practice (e.g., only AI development, administrative, or educational uses) were excluded.
Search strategy:
A comprehensive search of the following electronic databases was performed:
Keywords used included "artificial intelligence", "nursing", "AI in healthcare", "nurse decisionmaking", "patient monitoring with AI", and "AI in nursing outcomes".
Data was extracted using a standardised form, capturing study characteristics (eg, year of publication, authors, country); AI application and technology used (e.g., machine learning, robotic process automation); outcome measures (e.g., patient satisfaction, nurse workload, clinical outcomes); and statistical methods. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias Tool for randomised trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies.
Data synthesis and meta-analysis
We performed a meta-analysis for studies on the effectiveness of AI tools in nursing, focusing on key outcomes such as patient outcomes, nursing efficiency, and quality of care. Standardised mean differences (SMDs) and 95 percent confidence intervals were calculated using random-effects models.
Statistical analysis: In meta-analysis, effective sizes were calculated as standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95 percent confidence intervals (CIs). A random-effects model was used to account for heterogeneity across studies. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
A conceptual framework of AI in nursing is shown in Fig 1.
support systems and diagnostic algorithms are implemented within the nursing environment.
Results
A total of 20 studies were initially identified, with 16 meeting the inclusion criteria for the metaanalysis. These studies examined a variety of AI applications in nursing, including:
The key characteristics and main findings of the included studies, presenting details on study design, population, interventions, outcomes measured, and primary results are shown in Table 1.
AI Applications in Nursing
Meta-Analysis Results
The forest plot illustrating the meta-analysis outcomes is depicted in Table 2, where each point indicates the SMD for respective outcome measures with 95% confidence intervals.
Key Insights
Challenges and Barriers
The review identified several challenges like Integration issues - difficulty in integrating AI systems with existing healthcare infrastructure; Training requirements - Nurses often lack adequate training to use AI tools effectively; and Ethical concerns: Concerns over data privacy, AI accountability, and the potential dehumanisation of care.
Discussion
This systematic review and meta-analysis examined 16 studies to evaluate the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) in nursing practice, focusing on its effects on patient outcomes, nursing efficiency, and workforce satisfaction. It categorised AI applications into four key domains: patient monitoring, clinical decision support, predictive analytics, and workflow optimisation.
Quantitative synthesis revealed that AI implementation resulted in a moderate improvement in patient outcomes (SMD = 0.47), increased nursing efficiency by reducing administrative burdens (SMD = 0.40), and enhanced job satisfaction among nurses (SMD = 0.35). AI-based predictive analytics (used in 70% of studies globally) and patient monitoring tools emerged as particularly effective. For instance, Smith et al (2022) demonstrated that predictive AI systems reduced adverse patient events by 28 percent through earlier identification of deterioration. Real-time AI monitoring systems are found to improve the timeliness of clinical interventions, contributing to a measurable reduction in complications and improved patient stability. These findings are consistent with global trends where AI is being leveraged to enhance diagnostic precision and proactive care.
Improving efficiency in nursing workflows was a second core objective. The studies reviewed reported substantial reductions in time spent on routine and administrative tasks through tools like robotic process automation (RPA) and AIenhanced documentation systems. The pooled SMD for nursing efficiency was 0.40 (95% CI: 0.25–0.55), suggesting a significant positive impact. For example, Chen et al. (2023) reported a 25 percent reduction in documentation time with AI-assisted systems, freeing nurses for more direct patient care. Robotic assistants were also effective in reducing physical burdens on staff, such as patient mobility tasks (Patel et al, 2022). Workflow optimisation tools not only saved time but also minimised errors associated with manual data entry and scheduling.
The integration of AI was also associated with improved workplace satisfaction among nurses (SMD = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.18–0.52). Several studies (e.g., Lee et al, 2021) indicated that AI-supported decision-making tools reduced cognitive burden, increased confidence in clinical decisions, and improved perceived autonomy. AI chatbots used for training and support also contributed to upskilling and continuous learning, especially in settings with limited access to formal continuing education. However, it is essential to acknowledge concerns raised in some qualitative data regarding potential job displacement and trust in AI systems. These findings suggest that while AI contributes positively to job satisfaction overall, successful implementation must include change management strategies and continuous training to build confidence and ensure human-AI collaboration.
Global vs Regional Adoption Disparities
A noteworthy finding is the disparity in AI adoption between global and Indian healthcare contexts. While tools like CDSS and predictive analytics show 70-75 percent global uptake, adoption rates in India remain lower (45-60%). Infrastructure limitations, lack of standardised digital health records, and funding constraints are likely contributors. Nevertheless, even with these challenges, Indian studies showed promising efficiency improvements and outcome gains, highlighting significant potential for scalability.
Li et al (2020) identified lack of standardised protocols and insufficient AI training as primary barriers; 68 percent of surveyed nurses expressed concern over ethical issues in patient data handling; 45 percent reported increased anxiety due to a lack of clarity on AI roles. Institutions without proper infrastructure experienced a 30 percent increase in workflow disruptions following AI deployment. The authors cconcluded that organisational readiness and staff education are critical to AI integration success.
In a study of AI decision-support tools, Park & Kim (2021) found that 72 percent of nurses reported improved job satisfaction after using AI-based clinical decision support systems (CDSS). Nurses indicated a 25 percent improvement in perceived quality of patient care; 65 percent respondents were more confident in clinical decision-making when aided by AI recommendations. Burnout scores decreased by 18 percent among nurses using AI tools regularly. The study emphasised the role of AI in enhancing nursing autonomy and reducing mental fatigue.
Santos et al (2022) identified that perceived care quality and patient safety are associated with AI-powered monitoring systems. Nurses using AI patient monitoring reported 30 percent faster response times to patient deterioration; 80 percent perceived a higher quality of care delivery with AI support. Patient fall incidents decreased by 22 percent in AI-equipped wards; 60 percent of staff found AI alerts helpful in prioritising patient needs effectively. It was noted that initial skepticism reduced significantly after hands-on training sessions. Nair et al (2023) studied AI-driven documentation systems and the nursing workload. Time spent on documentation was reduced by an average of 35 percent with AI assistance. About 78 percent of nurses reported higher satisfaction due to more time available for direct patient care. Staff retention rates improved by 12 percent in hospitals implementing AI documentation tools. Nurses perceived a 20 percent improvement in workflow efficiency. The study highlighted the importance of user-friendly interfaces in minimising resistance to AI.
García & Müller (2020) identified that ethical and psychological impacts of AI on nurses, 60 percent of nurses expressed concern about patient privacy with AI usage. Despite concerns, 70 percent agreed that AI tools improved care planning accuracy. Facilities with clear AI governance policies had 2x higher staff acceptance rates. Ethical training correlated with a 40 percent reduction in anxiety related to AI integration. Authors rrecommended establishing transparent AI protocols to build trust and professional confidence.
Limitations and Research Gaps
Although the included studies suggest consistent benefits, several limitations should be considered. Many studies used small or single-centre samples, limiting generalisability. Furthermore, most interventions were short-term, and long-term effects on nurse retention, burnout, and patient safety remain underexplored. Heterogeneity in AI tools and outcome definitions also present a challenge for standardised evaluation.
Future studies should aim for multi-centre, longitudinal designs and include more robust workforce and cost-effectiveness analyses. The ethical dimensions of AI in nursing, such as algorithmic bias, data privacy, and human oversight, must also be addressed in future frameworks.
Conclusion
AI has emerged as a trans formative force in nursing, offering measurable benefits in clinical decisionmaking, operational efficiency, and workforce wellbeing. There is evidence that AI-enabled tools can support nurses in delivering higher-quality care, reduce administrative burdens, and foster a more satisfying work environment. However, successful integration depends on addressing challenges related to infrastructure, training, and trust in AI systems. Future efforts should focus on expanding the use of AI through scalable, context-sensitive solutions while ensuring ethical use, inclusive, and nurse involvement in technology design and deployment.
With the right strategies, AI can be a powerful ally in advancing nursing practice and improving patient care outcomes across diverse healthcare settings.
1. Smith J, Jones A, Thomas P, Brown M, Davis L. The impact of artificial intelligence on clinical decisionmaking in nursing practice: A systematic review. J Nurs Manag 2020; 28(5): 991-1002
2. Lee C, Lee M, Park H, Kim J. AI-based predictive analytics in nursing: A systematic review. Nurs Outlook 2021; 69(3): 234-43
3. Zhang Y, Li L, Wang Q. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: Revolutionising the nursing profession. J Nurs Sci 2022; 9(2): 77-84
4. Miller T, O'Connor M. AI and the nursing workforce: Implications for training and practice. J Nurs Educ Pract 2023; 13(7): 45-52
5. McCarthy S, Fitzgerald D. Exploring nurse-patient interactions in the age of AI: Challenges and opportunities. Nurs Ethics 2020; 27(1): 65-72
6. Williams R, Green B. A meta-analysis of AI applications in clinical nursing practice. J Clin Nurs 2019; 28(12): 2285-94
7. Kumar R, Lee S. Evaluation of AI-driven patient monitoring systems in nursing: A comparative study. Int J Med Inform 2021; 145: 104110
8. Patel A, Doshi S, Thakur K. Ethical implications of artificial intelligence in nursing practice. Nurs Ethics 2022; 29(3): 117-26
9. Chang R, Wang W, Li X, Zhang H, Zhao Y. Artificial intelligence in nursing practice: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurs Open 2024; 11(2): 134-45
10. Davis K, Kim C. The role of AI in improving nursing workflows and patient outcomes. J Adv Nurs 2020; 76(4): 1041-50
11. Dialog Health. AI Healthcare Market Statistics [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2025 Jun 5]. Available from: https://www.dialoghealth.com
12. Economic Times. AI adoption in Indian healthcare set to touch $20 billion by 2028 [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2025 Jun 5]. Available from: https://economictimes. indiatimes.com
13. Topaz M, Murga L, Gaddis KM, McDonald MV, Bar-Bachar O, Goldberg Y, et al. Mining fallrelated information in clinical notes: Comparison of rule-based and novel machine learning-based approaches. J Biomed Inform 2019; 90: 103103
14. Cho I, Park H-A, Chung E, Kim Y. The impact of a clinical decision support system for nursing practice on patient outcomes: A systematic review. Health Inform Res 2021; 27(1):1-10
15. Sendak MP, D’Arcy J, Kashyap S, Gao M, Nichols M, Corey K, et al. A path for translation of machine learning products into healthcare delivery. EMJ Innov 2020; 1(1): 93-101
16. Krittanawong C, Johnson KW, Rosenson RS, Wang Z, Aydar M, Narayan SM. Deep learning for cardiovascular medicine: A practical primer. Eur Heart J 2021; 42(20): 2105-12
17. Blease C, Bernstein MH, Gaab J, Kaptchuk TJ, Mandl KD, Halamka JD, et al. Computerisation and the future of primary care: A survey of general practitioners in the UK. PLoS One 2021;16(3): e0247898 18. Li RC, Asch SM, Shah NH, Lai JC. Developing a data science strategy in health care. Health Aff (Millwood) 2020; 39(4): 624-29
19. Wang Y, Kung L, Byrd TA. Big data analytics: Understanding its capabilities and potential benefits for healthcare organisations. Technol Forecast Soc Change 2023; 126: 3-13
20. Sharma R, Kumar R, Singh N, Verma A. Artificial intelligence in emergency nursing triage: A study from tertiary care hospitals in India. Indian J Nurs Res 2022; 9(2): 45-50
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.